When an investor buys into a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to gain exposure to a pre-IPO company, the pitch is usually framed around the underlying issuer — its growth trajectory, its last funding round, what the secondary market is pricing it at today. Almost no energy goes into the document that actually governs the investor's rights: the SPV operating agreement.

That document defines who controls the SPV, what the manager can do without asking investors, what happens if the manager becomes insolvent or stops responding, and whether investors can do anything about it. These are not edge cases. Manager disputes, wind-downs, and outright failures have touched enough secondary deals in the last few years that the questions below should be routine due diligence, not afterthoughts.

Who the manager is — and what they can do unilaterally

An SPV is typically structured as a single-purpose LLC. The manager (sometimes called the general partner in a fund-style vehicle) is the person or entity that formed it, signed the transfer documents with the issuer, and now sits between the investors and the underlying shares. That position carries significant discretion.

In most standard operating agreements, the manager can: decide when and whether to sell the underlying shares, accept or reject a tender offer on behalf of the SPV, negotiate secondary sales of the SPV's position, and determine the timing of distributions. Investors are typically passive members. They hold economics; the manager holds control.

This structure exists for a reason. It keeps the SPV's cap-table footprint small — one entry rather than dozens — and allows quick decision-making during liquidity events. But it also means that if the manager's interests diverge from yours, you have limited levers to pull.

Manager / GP
The entity or individual with control authority over the SPV — signs on behalf of all members, exercises voting rights, manages distributions.
Passive member / LP
An investor who holds an economic interest in the SPV but has no day-to-day control rights.
Operating agreement
The LLC's governing document. Overrides anything a salesperson told you verbally.
Majority-in-interest vote
A provision allowing a defined percentage of members by capital contribution to take binding action — the main tool for manager removal.

The three governance clauses that actually matter

1. Manager removal and replacement

Some operating agreements allow investors to remove the manager for cause (fraud, willful misconduct, material breach of the agreement) by a majority-in-interest vote. Others allow removal without cause. Many allow neither until a specific sunset date or liquidity event. Before investing, ask directly: under what conditions can the manager be removed, and what percentage of invested capital must agree?

If the answer is "only for cause" and the definition of cause is narrow, you are essentially locked in with whoever formed the vehicle. In practice, proving fraud or willful misconduct requires litigation. Litigation takes years and costs money that comes from the same pool as your invested capital.

2. Manager insolvency, dissolution, and succession

What happens if the management entity — often a small LLC itself — winds down, files for bankruptcy, or simply stops operating? A well-drafted operating agreement names a successor manager or gives members the right to appoint one. A poorly drafted agreement may leave the SPV in legal limbo, requiring a court-supervised process to establish authority to act on the underlying shares.

This is not hypothetical. Several SPV managers formed during the 2021 private market boom have since become unreachable or insolvent. Investors in those vehicles have found themselves holding interests in an entity with no functioning management, which means no ability to sell, no distributions, and no clear path to enforcement.

3. Conflicts of interest and related-party transactions

Managers sometimes run multiple SPVs investing in the same issuer at different price points. If a tender offer comes in below the manager's blended cost basis in a later vehicle but above yours, the manager may have an incentive to accept or decline that offer in ways that benefit one pool over another. Look for conflict-of-interest disclosure provisions and any requirement that related-party decisions be approved by a disinterested majority.

The operating agreement is a contract, not marketing material. If a clause protects you, it will say so explicitly. If it doesn't say so, assume the protection isn't there.

Practical questions to ask before you wire

The following questions are not exhaustive legal due diligence — consult your own counsel for that — but they are the ones that separate investors who have read the agreement from those who haven't.

  1. Can the manager be removed without cause, and if so, by what vote threshold expressed as a percentage of contributed capital?
  2. If the manager entity dissolves or becomes insolvent, who has authority to act on behalf of the SPV in the interim?
  3. Does the manager hold any economic interest in the SPV that creates an incentive to delay or accelerate a sale?
  4. Are there any other SPVs managed by the same entity investing in the same issuer at different price points?
  5. What is the process for calling a member vote, and does the operating agreement require the manager to facilitate that process?
  6. Is there a defined end date or automatic wind-up provision, and what happens to unclaimed distributions?

A manager who bristles at these questions before you invest is giving you information. A manager who answers them clearly and points to the relevant sections of the operating agreement is giving you a different kind of information.

How SPV structure at Limen Markets addresses these points

We use templated SPV operating agreements that include explicit for-cause and without-cause removal provisions, a named successor manager mechanism, and conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements. We also make the operating agreement available for review before any capital commitment — not after. Investors are encouraged to share the document with their own legal counsel.

We are not suggesting our structure eliminates governance risk — no SPV eliminates it entirely. We are saying that governance risk should be legible before you invest, and we build our documents to make it legible.

The economics of a secondary deal — price per share, implied valuation, expected exit multiple — are the variables that get discussed most. They are also the variables over which you have the least control once you are a passive member. Governance is the variable that determines what happens when things don't go according to plan.

If you are evaluating an SPV opportunity on our marketplace or elsewhere, start with the operating agreement. If you would like to review current secondary offerings where the governing documents are ready for your review, visit the marketplace.